Chapter V. By the Sweat of your Brow: The Enthalpy and Entropy
Professions
As we have seen, the first and second laws of thermodynamics provide
an energy model for the flux of currency through our economic
system. Equivalent to energy, currency by the first law is neither
created nor destroyed, it just changes form, but by the second law,
it does permanently dissipate. For any system, energy must be
continuously sourced to maintain order, thus the Federal Reserve
continually dumps more currency into the economic system.
Unfortunately this currency is not tied to an energy equivalent.
Instead the energy driving the whole system is traded within. The
assumption that energy resources are nothing but commodities bought
and sold in an economy of unlimited growth is nothing short of an
assumption of perpetual motion. Thus the Federal Reserve is nothing
short of a perpetual motion machine. Within that system lie the
workers that produce economic output. The first and second laws
provide another metaphor for the economy, specifically an analogy of
economic output to the output of energy released from a fuel.
If we compare total economic production to the output of a chemical
reaction, the two forms of energy release from a reaction, enthalpy
and entropy, correspond to the two forms of economic production,
profitable and not profitable. A fuel is chemical potential energy,
and its release has both ordered and disordered manifestations
accommodated by the surroundings. Likewise, total economic
production releases both ordered and disordered manifestations
accommodated by society. Though not considered in GDP, our current
measure of economic productivity, total economic production includes
waste production. The first form of energy released from a chemical
reaction is enthalpy, the sum of heat and work from the reaction.
Heat and work are what is desired from a reaction. By analogy, the
enthalpy form of economic production is the sum of all things
possibly profitable, derived from the “fuel” of the economy. Heat
and work are forms of equivalent energies, but they are not of equal
value to the system. Some of the heat may even be a waste, i.e. a
liability, a debit. Though it may be hard for students from
Wisconsin to conceptualize, there is such a thing as waste heat.
Likewise, not all forms of even profitable economic output are
rewarded by currency of equal value. By and large though, enthalpy
is profitable. The second form of energy released from a chemical
reaction is entropy, the energetic sum of the disorder generated in
the reaction, a sum of things possibly requiring re-ordering in the
system from the reaction having been run. By analogy, the entropy
form of economic production is the sum of all things possibly
requiring maintenance in the society or environment from the economy
having been run. By and large, entropy is not profitable, but must
be accounted for in order for the reaction to run, the economy to
complete.
Professions in our economy divide on these lines as well, the
enthalpy professions focused on profit, and the entropy professions
focused on the maintenance of our society. Our current economic
system rewards the enthalpy professions. The enthalpy professions
make something of value, i.e. something needed by a large percentage
of the population within the economy, but they also consume the
resources available in the society, including, or even especially,
human resources. Profit is also possible from the entropy
professions, those professions that maintain the society, but by and
large, entropy professions are most notable for the McSalary: no
matter the time, training or experience of the entropic worker, a
salary that is fixed within a few percent of other entropic workers:
no commission, no profit, and thus no incentive other than personal
dedication. Does the Ph.D. down at the water treatment plant ever
stand to make as much as Bill Gates? Though it could be argued that
Bill Gates produced “something of value” and thus deserves reward,
his defecations create just as much disorder as anyone else's,
disorder remediated by the entropic professional with every bit as
much creativity and intellectual prowess. To satisfy a Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs, the entropy professions must be completed
before any enthalpy profession can get started. Due to their
unprofitable but necessary nature, the entropy professions tend to
fall into the government or service sector of the economy. A
complete energy economy needs to more fairly place an economic
reward on the entropy professions, those that maintain the
environment, the society, its health, and its human resources.
All of our work creates order. What do millions of Americans, and
billions of people worldwide, do for a living? They create order
from disorder, everything from making an automobile from steel
parts, trimming trees and planting flower gardens, fighting and
healing disease, making a computer microchip from some silicon and
solder, growing and preparing food, putting ink to paper for designs
and reports, and educating human brains that are somewhat
intellectually disordered when young. Unfortunately even the profit
is fleeting: the value we place on existing order rapidly
depreciates. The Intel 8088 chip of 1979, used in the first IBM PC
of 1981, represented some of the highest human achievement and
accumulation of both intellectual and manufactured order to date,
but by today’s standards, is worthless. The current economy is
predicated on growth and consumption, making entropic waste the
chief economic output.
Enter the entropy professions. Entropy professions lean more toward
maintaining existing order, or create an order that is largely taken
for granted. In the current economic structure, typical
characteristics of entropy work can be identified:
1) Entropy work is paid for through taxes, or through costs to other
businesses brought on by regulation, related litigation, or the need
for risk management, paid as apportioned risk in insurance premiums.
Thus commonly the work itself may feel thankless, or is viewed as
burdensome to the “greater” economic bottom line, an expense and not
an asset. As is often the case for such entropic concerns, the
expense of environmental pro-action may even be viewed as an
unnecessary luxury.
2) The McSalary: Entropy workers’ incomes are relatively the same
and fixed to keep the expense of the work low. The income is
commonly dissociated from a profit motive. For example, education is
rarely profitable, without taxes, when the school must draw across
all levels of ability and family income. Entropy work typically
produces or maintains that which is assumed, and in the case of
education, the product, an assumed supply of educated human
resources, is not bought or sold, just tapped.
The desire of the technocrats for political control in the 1930’s
was understandable. Entropy professionals are acutely aware of the
crises facing society at large, quite often staring death in the
face. They may also be the only ones who see what must be done. In
1956, a leading technocrat, M.K. Hubbert, against the wishes of his
employer, Shell Oil, published his prediction that the peak in U.S.
oil production would occur between 1965 and 1970. Peak U.S.
production did occur in 1971. Hubbert later predicted global oil
production would peak between 1995 and 2000. Though the jury is
still deliberating whether this has occurred, or when it will occur,
the ramifications are dire. Meanwhile the population at large floats
along with its current celebrity gossip preoccupation. Political
control is in the hands of the moneyed interests, thus the first
step toward actually doing what must be done is to convince someone
with money, but usually without a clue, not only what must be done,
but that a profit can be made doing so, even if that profit is only
a reduction in legal liability. The time is spent “project managing”
while skill sets fade and the work is delegated. An alternative is
to convince a Washington bureaucrat to fund your research project, a
futility for certain disciplines in certain political climates, e.g.
environmental science, especially when the whole of the
science
is
assailed
and obfuscated as a conspiracy, “challenged” by real colluders
with infinite sums of cash. A cynical view holds that America
is not interested in science, only the capitalization of science.
America does have a long history of importing foreign science
talent. Except for the teaching component, the university does not
cover a professor’s salary, thus to extract the funding from
Washington, the professor spends his time writing research grants
all day and “project managing,” perpetuating a system where the
actual research and teaching is conducted by graduate students and
immigrant labor for slightly more than a teenager makes on minimum
wage. Along with tuition increases at the rate of credit card
interest, endowments from alumni, grants from the private sector,
but admittedly an ever decreasing amount of tax support, even a Wall
Street banker could turn a lucrative profit without sinking the
ship, and yet in their infinite wisdom, university
administrations
think
they
can close their geology department and still maintain their
university accreditation, all while paying their football
coach over a half million dollars per year for losing seasons.
Bottom line, the control is in the money, and the work toward doing
what must be done cannot get started without capital. An
industrialist once stated that the beauty of capitalism was the
ability it granted for a business to generate the capital needed to
begin production. If that capital is not being made available, the
capitalists are not doing their job. Today, like the 1930’s of
Hubbert’s time, the profits are sent to financial wizards who view
the whole capital machination as a casino game played with OPM,
other people’s money. At least Bill Gates produced something along
with his defecations. What
have
these clowns produced? Psychology has proven (hypothesis
tested) that the
population
divides between hypocrisy, those with power who
have
a sense of entitlement along with a willingness to be hypocritical,
versus hypercrisy,
those who don’t feel personally entitled to their power, forgo
power, and are harder on themselves than on others. The
phenomenon perpetuates social inequality. Today the entropy
professionals would settle for the ability to control their own
lives and careers.
Entropy work should be viewed as an energy resource and rewarded
accordingly. But if we introduce the energy value of maintenance
into a complete energy economy, how do we pay for it? For
environmental maintenance in particular, how do we pay for the
ecological services, what we now largely take for granted, what is
still mostly provided by the natural world free of charge? If billed
to completely treat emissions and waste, “energy” would be billing
us in one form or another, both coming and going, and the price of
even basic resources such as food and water would skyrocket. Those
resources may be a part of our economy that needs value
re-assessment, but the second law will always put us in debt. To
acknowledge the source of our debt–energy–is to at least take the
first steps in restructuring our economy to deal with it. We already
have a Federal Reserve that quantifies a steadily increasing debt.
What’s wrong with tagging that debt to its energy source, energy in
both its enthalpy and entropy forms? The bill for the true value of
food, water, and clean air is increasing.
If food, water, and air resources are considered a human right,
shouldn’t access to a minimum energy, so directly tied to
maintaining those resources, be considered a human right as well?
Energy is increasingly viewed as a public right. Writing
in
the
Albany
Times Union, Ed Ludwig, a US District Court judge in Philadelphia,
dared to suggest making oil a public utility, though he
acknowledged the political chances of this are “non-existent.” He
made his case, however, by using the definition of a public utility
as " ‘a business that provides an everyday necessity to the public
at large’ - such as water, electricity, natural gas, telephone
service, transportation, cable TV and other essentials.” Given our
corporatism, the merger of corporate and state power that Mussolini
once equated with fascism, it is more than unlikely oil will ever be
made public, even with the change in administration. Oil has made
more people more money than any commodity in history. Ipso facto
energy is very definitely “an everyday necessity to the public at
large.”
Corporations attempting to “go green” are discovering that there is
money to be saved by cutting consumption and thus saving resources,
a realization of the “low hanging fruit.” Conservation, though, is
still generally anathema to a consumer-based economy at large. The
“higher hanging fruit” is usually associated with the green
initiatives that benefit the society and its economy at large, but
at cost to the individual economic entity. Ironically, in an economy
driven by consumption, the pursuit of the “low hanging fruit”
typically benefits the economic entity at the expense of the greater
economy elsewhere–have an e-meeting rather than flying, saving money
and emissions, and an airline loses business–whereas typically the
“higher hanging fruit” costs an economic entity while benefiting
society at large. Other than positive public relations generated
from being good corporate citizens, less incentive exists for a
corporation to pursue those aspects of going green that have a
dis-incentive in terms of cost. If a company or individual must
always respond to its bottom line, “doing the right thing” will only
go so far.
Incentives for “doing the right thing” lie at the heart of
cap-and-trade programs, tax incentives, and other rewards for being
responsible. But there is only so much to be gained from
restructuring society’s areas of profit and loss. We must
acknowledge the source of our debt–energy–and tackle it economically
head on. If we based our currency on a unit of energy and limited
the Federal Reserve’s infusion of cash into the economy to the total
energy resources made available to the economy–both from domestic
and imported supplies, both from fossil fuels and alternatives–the
source of our debts would become readily apparent, particularly in
our trade deficit. To address energy realistically, something we
seem to refuse to do, we must admit to the finite nature of fossil
fuel resources, as well as admit to the limitations of the
continuously sourced [renewable] energies, particularly in the face
of expanding human population.
Only the energy from controlled nuclear fusion can possibly keep
pace with population into the future. It is a mathematical
certainty. And yet, while we talk of a new Manhattan Project or
Apollo Project to solve the energy crisis once and for all, in FY
2008
we
pulled
our funding from ITER, the international consortium for
nuclear fusion research. International because the dream is global.
The key for enabling us, the individual consumer, to be able to pay
for the increased cost of the entropy in our economy and environment
is to have our own work rewarded in terms of its energy
contribution, not just in Joules of output, but in the value of the
order we create, a value stemming from human capital. Imagine the
cumulative energy invested into a high school graduate, our
society’s minimum educational requirement for our human capital. We
are the ones that make our economy balance. We are the ones that
maintain order. As workers we will never match the debt of our
energy consumption. Human output in the form of physical work pales
in comparison, as a popular physics experiment demonstrates. When
students ride an exercise bike hooked to a generator powering 25
Watt, then 50 Watt, then 75 Watt light-bulbs for two minutes, the
exertion is a surprise to them. The comparison of their reasonable
human output in kilowatt-hrs to a typical monthly electric bill
shows that we would need 320 humans on exercise bikes to supply each
typical American household’s electric consumption. So where is the
value in human work? Our work is in our capacity to perceive order,
and then to create that order using whatever resources are available
to us, including energy and human capital. Though we are learning
that abstract thought is not unique to humans, including the ability
to make tools and modify our habitat, it is our exceptional ability
to do so that gives us our dominion on the planet, our exceptional
ability to reconstruct what is in our minds. We can perceive the
abstract concepts of energy and the second law of thermodynamics. We
can also dream of unlimited clean energy.